The Execution of Seal Team Six

Penned by Ann Barnhardt 8-7-11

On May 5th, I had an email conversation with a retired military man with spook contacts. All were in total agreement that the Bin Laden episode was pure theater. The SEALS were sent into a compound as evidenced by the lost chopper on site. But Osama Bin Laden wasn't in that compound. Osama Bin Laden has been dead for years. Bin Laden had a genetic condition that caused renal failure (this genetic condition is common among deeply inbred Saudi Arab Muslims). Bin Laden had been on dialysis BEFORE 9/11. Dialysis is difficult enough for people in first world countries who can have it done in outstanding facilities. Bin Laden was having it done either in caves or in homes post 9/11. People in renal failure having dialysis done in caves do NOT live for ten more years, that is fact. There was no dialysis equipment found in the compound the SEALS raided on May 2. Of course there wasn't. Bin Laden wasn't in that compound because Bin Laden has been dead for years.

This is why the body was declared positively identified faster than any known DNA testing process in existence and this DNA testing was carried out not in a lab mind you, but inside a Chinook helicopter and/or V-22 Osprey of helos en route to the USS Carl Vinson. The body was then dumped into the Indian Ocean in a mad dash to ensure that burial took place within 24 hours of death in order to honor muslim burial traditions. Not a single picture of the so-called Bin Laden corpse has ever been released and never will because you cannot release something that does not exist.

The entire Bin Laden episode was stagecraft. It was pure theater that was designed to give Obama a boost in the polls and give distraction and cover. Distract from what? Cover from what?

April 20, 2011: The release date of Dr. Jerome Corsi's book, Where's the Birth Certificate is announced as May 17, and pre-sales begin on Amazon.com. Corsi's work is known to be extremely thorough and meticulous. Within hours, Corsi's book is #1 on Amazon.com 'fully 28 days before its release. The Obama regime is panicked.

April 27, 2011: In order to diffuse and undercut the Corsi book, the Obama regime releases a PDF image purported to be a scan of his original long-form Hawaiian birth certificate. Within hours, thousands of graphic designers, many of whom are self-professed Obama voters and supporters, isolate and demonstrate with dozens of objective proof sets that the PDF released by the Obama regime is not just a forgery, but an astoundingly incompetent and obvious forgery.

April 27 through May 2: The Obama regime is now in a blind panic. Deeming it too risky, instead of commissioning the forged birth certificate from document and photo illustration experts within the CIA or NSA, the Obama regime instead farmed the project off on someone inside the White House with a functional but middling knowledge of photo illustration programs. To the thoroughly inexpert eyes of Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and Valerie Jarrett, the forged certificate file appeared extremely convincing, and was thus released with fanfare. Within hours, they knew that they had not only made a mistake, but a massive mistake that could land them all in prison. The forger was so incompetent that he/she didn't even flatten the image thus compressing and masking the component layers before posting it. And that was just the tip of the iceberg of glaring flaws and errors. The mainstream press was, so far, completely complicit in the cover-up of the forgery, but Rathergate proved that if the forgery debunking generated any mainstream traction whatsoever, the end could come swiftly. The Obama regime needed a big distraction and they needed it fast. They had been planning on holding the staged Bin Laden capture and killing until 2012 ­ for the thick of the campaign, and perhaps as an October Surprise, but it would have to be moved up to now.

May 2, 2011: The Bin Laden operation occurs. In all likelihood, a low-to-mid level Taliban or insurgent leader is killed.

May 3, 2011: Within hours, Vice President Joe Biden destroys any notions of OPSEC and bellows to the entire world in public remarks at a dinner at the Ritz Carlton that the Bin Laden raid was carried out by the SEALS. Within hours Obama regime had gleefully leaked that the raid was carried out by SEAL Team 6, also known as DEVGRU. Up until this point in history, all DEVGRU activities and information had been highly classified. Now the term SEAL Team 6 was blasted across every newspaper in the world, with Disney even moving to trademark the name. The Obama regime wanted the ENTIRE WORLD to know the name SEAL Team 6.

May 5, 2011: As I said earlier, I conversed with retired military contact with spook contacts regarding the obvious theatrics of the Bin Laden episode and the need for a cover-up by the Obama regime. The conversation ended with the following exchange:

Ann: I'm on the US Military casualty email list. It would be NO PROBLEM to hide casualties. It's a steady stream out of Afghanistan.

Contact: look for training accidents in the eastern mountains.

May 6, 2011: Obama travels to Ft. Campbell, KY to openly meet and congratulate SEAL Team 6 members. This receives huge press coverage, and the press declares the incident a huge boost [for Obama] going into 2012.

The Execution of SEAL Team Six (Part 2)

Posted by Ann Barnhard August 6, AD 2011 August 6, 2011: A Chinook helo is shot down in Tangi, Wardak Province, Afghanistan. Within hours, before family notifications could possibly have been completed, global press accounts positively confirm that 22 of the 30 Americans killed were not just SEALS, but members of SEAL Team 6. Again, DEVGRU operations have been, up until now, highly classified. Today, the Obama regime made a point of immediately revealing the unit identities of the SPECOPS forces among the dead.

In the past, DEVGRU men and other SPECOPS men have been killed in action, but their missions were so secret and so crucial to OPSEC that their deaths were covered-up by the government and attributed to such things as training accidents and the like ­and I have no problem with that. These men understand going in to intense units such as DEVGRU that OPSEC is paramount, that they will never be publicly acknowledged for their heroism, and that if they are killed or captured in action, the government will lie about that in order to protect OPSEC and to prevent the enemy from gaining a propaganda and morale coup. Compare that reality with what happened today. The Obama regime distributed this information, and the Obama regime's lapdog press instantly splashed headlines declaring this as the Taliban's REVENGE for the death of Bin Laden. As I write this now, the Drudge Report headline in bright red reads, REVENGE: SEALS WHO GOT OSAMA KILLED IN AFGHANISTAN.

I'll say what everyone else is thinking but is too scared to say. The Obama regime is almost certainly directly complicit in these deaths. The time, location and most especially, the PASSENGERS in the Chinook were passed to the Taliban. Additionally, you can't take out a Chinook with small arms fire or even standard RPGs such as the Taliban use. The Taliban needed serious weaponry to take this helo down, and that serious weaponry needed to be in exactly the right spot at exactly the right time, ready to fire.

Why would the Obama regime kill Americans? I think the question is, why WOULDN'T the Obama regime kill Americans? The Obama regime is composed of Marxist-Leninist psychopaths. A glancing, superficial survey of 20th century history shows one glaring fact above all others: MARXISTS MURDER PEOPLE WITHOUT COMPUNCTION. Marxists also hate Americans, by definition. Three tacks:

The men on board the Chinook may have been the same men who participated or had direct knowledge of the staged Bin Laden raid and were killed to permanently silence them. See my email exchange of May 5 above. These DEVGRU men were killed to send a signal to the surviving DEVGRU men who carried out the Bin Laden raid to keep their mouths shut. Certainly, the release of the unit identity of the dead within hours ­ before even family notification could have been made (which requires an IN PERSON visit to the family, remember) was an obvious bow to Al Qaeda, the Taliban and the entire muslim world. This event was INSTANTLY propagandized by the Obama media as revenge exacted for Bin Laden's death. And remember, Bin Laden has been dead for many years. The raid of May 2 was pure stagecraft to distract the world from the release of the forged Obama birth certificate. I am not a conspiracy theorist. I can't stand Alex Jones or any 9/11 truther. I have turned down dozens of interviews with such types. In fact, I am a huge believer in the Lex Parsimoniae, which is sometimes called Occam's Razor, which states that the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one. I teach this as part of my job, namely that the cattle markets are neither manipulated nor impossible to operate within at a profit. The reality is that the cattle industry participants do not make money because they are functionally incompetent. It is very, very simple. True conspiracies are very rare.

This entire Obama situation is a conspiracy, and I say that without the slightest hesitation. Obama is not a citizen of the United States, he is a puppet front for a cabal of Marxist-Leninsts including Soros, Ayers, Dohrn, Strong, Jarrett and many, many others. These people are enemies of the United States. These people are deeply psychologically damaged, and are capable of ordering people murdered in order to protect themselves and increase their own power. The three dead homosexual black men from Trinity United Church of Christ, Young, Bland and Spencer, all of whom were sexually linked to Barack Obama, were probably the first people specifically murdered by the Obama regime. The hundreds of Mexicans and the two American agents Terry and Zapata were murdered by Operation Fast and Furious in order to advance and increase the power of the Obama regime. These SEALS and the others on board that Chinook were almost certainly betrayed and murdered by the Obama regime.

Why did the Obama regime immediately reveal the unit identity of the SPECOPS forces involved in the first place, despite the fact that DEVGRU was highly classified? Why was the personnel composition of the Chinook released IMMEDIATELY after the helo went down ­before even family notifications could be made? WHY? Why would you hand your enemy, Al Qaeda and the Taliban, a massive propaganda coup? WHY?

I'll tell you why. Because the Obama regime IS THE ENEMY. They are Marxist tyrants who hold the lives of Americans not just cheap, but in scathing contempt. They will say anything, they will do anything, and they will murder ANYONE in order to protect themselves and consolidate and increase their power. Please, I beg you, for the love of God and all that is good in this world, read the history of the Soviet Union. Read about Lenin and Stalin and how they murdered people without any hesitation. Read about how Hitler was constantly ordering the murder of his own officers. Read about Communist China. Read about Mao and the millions upon tens of millions of murders he ordered. Read about the killing fields of the Communist Khmer Rouge in Cambodia led by Pol Pot. PLEASE. Marxists MURDER PEOPLE. That is what they do. The Obama regime is MARXIST to the bone. If the Obama regime is not stopped, the 30 American Seals murdered in Afghanistan will be just the beginning. I promise you that.

Here, again, is the clip of Larry Grathwohl, who infiltrated the Weather Underground Marxist terrorist organization in the 1970s. The Weather Underground was founded by Obama's political godfather, communist mentor (along with Frank Marshall Davis), murderer, and ghostwriter of Dreams From My Father, Bill Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn. In this interview, taped in 1980 while Obama was still just an unknown undergrad foreign scholarship student at Occidental College, Grathwohl describes the leadership of the Weather Underground (which is Ayers and Dohrn) discussing what will be done with the unreformable, diehard capitalists once they have overthrown the government of the United States. The answer is extermination in camps in the Southwest. The estimated total that would need to be killed? 25 million, which was 10% of the population at the time. Ayers & Dohrn already have overthrown the government of the United States via their puppet pro, Barack Obama. They have guaranteed that the economy will collapse. The only thing left for them to do is suspend the Constitution and open the camps.

Look At This Video

What's a billion dollars & Do we need Unions

A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

A billion hours ago our ancestors were
Living in the Stone Age.

A billion days ago no-one walked on the
earth on two feet.

A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes ago,
at the rate our government Is spending it.


While this thought is still fresh in our brain...tell me
again why your entitlement must survive while someone
else's must be abolished.

Can we get real together for just a moment? We can't
keep this spending up and we all know it. It is an
absolute joke to see those in the streets of Wisconsin
demanding that their barganing rights for their future
entitlements be left in tack. To hell with the fact that
their state is near filing for banruptcy.

The unions say the same pay for all. Doesn't that say
to the teachers that mundane skills are just fine and
doesn't it say to the finest teachers, that they should
find a new carear or, go to the private schools where
you get paid for your skills and not your tenure?

Does the volenteer fireman in mine as well as thousands
more cities mean that if they don't have bargining rights then
they will do a lousy job?

LABOR UNIONS ADD TO COSTS AND DISCOURAGE PRODUCTIVITY!

Would you want to work for a company that treats all
workers exactly the same, no matter how hard they work?
What about one that promotes only on the basis of
seniority and not merit?

Few Americans want a job with an employer who ignores
their individual efforts. Yet that's what labor unions
offer employees today. Small wonder membership is
steadily declining and why labor bosses do not want
to give the union worker the choice as to his/her dues
being deducted from their check.

The premise of collective bargaining is that by
representing all employees a union can negotiate a
better collective contract than each worker could get
through individual negotiations. But because the union
negotiates collectively, the same contract covers
every worker, regardless of his or her productivity or
effort.

In the manufacturing economy of the 1930s, this worked
reasonably well because there was less education. An
employee's unique talents and skills made little
difference on the assembly line.

In today's knowledge economy, however, collective
representation makes little sense. Machines perform
most of the repetitive manufacturing tasks of
yesteryear. Employers now want employees with individual
insights and abilities. The fastest-growing occupations
over the past quarter-century have been professional,
technical, and managerial in nature.

Additionally, economic changes mean that unions can
no longer deliver large gains to their members;unions
make it virtually impossible to lay off under-performing
workers. Unions boast that their members earn higher
wages than non-union workers. But they don't create
money out of thin air. They use their bargaining power
to take it from someone else. Contrary to popular
impression, that someone is usually not business
owners. It is consumers, who pay higher prices when
companies pass on the added cost of the union-wage bill.

The union mentality fits well with government workers;
government employees are used to bureaucracy that does
little to reward individual initiative therefore they
cross back and fourth nicely.

New workers who vote to join a union, however, do not
earn more than they would have if they had stayed
non-union.These modern realities are colliding with
problems that have long turned off workers, such as
corruption, unaccountable leadership, and members'
dues funding union bosses' lavish salaries. Not to
mention excessive political activism. One specific
example was that Unions spent $300 million to defeat
John McCain and to get the Union organizer elected
Barack Hussein Obama.


Despite decades of repeated failure, President Obama
and Democrats in Congress continue to promote the myth
that government can spend its way out of recession.
Proponents of President Barack Obama's $787 billion
stimulus bill continue to insist that the massive
government bailout played a decisive role in moving
the economy out of the recession. Yet assuming no
destructive government actions, the economy's self-
correction mechanism was widely expected to move the
economy out of recession in 2009 anyway. With a parade
of "stimulus" bills the past two years (going back to
President George W. Bush's tax rebate in early 2008),
it was entirely predictable that some would link the
expected end of the recession to whichever stimulus
bill happened to come last. During the 1930s, New
Deal lawmakers doubled federal spending--yet
unemployment remained above 20 percent until
World War II. In 2001, President Bush responded
to a recession by "injecting" tax rebates into the
economy. The economy did not respond until two years
later, when tax rate reductions were implemented. In
2008, President Bush tried to head off the current
recession with another round of tax rebates. The
recession continued to worsen. Now, the most recent
$787 billion stimulus bill was intended to keep the
unemployment rate from exceeding 8 percent. In
November 2010, it topped 10 percent.

The economic theory behind the stimulus builds on
the work of John Maynard Keynes eight decades ago.
It begins with the idea that an economic shock has
left demand persistently and significantly below
potential supply. As people stop spending money,
businesses pull back production, and the ensuing
vicious circle of falling demand and production
shrinks the economy.

Keynesians believe that government spending can
make up this shortfall in private demand. Their
models assume that--in an underperforming
economy/government, spending adds money to the
economy, taxes remove money from the economy,
and so the increase in the budget deficit
represents net new dollars injected. Therefore,
it scarcely matters how the dollars are spent.
Keynes is said to have famously asserted that
a government program that pays people to dig
and refill ditches would provide new income for
those workers to spend and circulate through
the economy, creating even more jobs and income.

The Keynesian argument also assumes that
consumption spending adds to immediate economic
growth while savings do not. By this reasoning,
unemployment benefits, food stamps, and low-
income tax rebates are among the most effective
stimulus policies because of their likelihood
to be consumed rather than saved.

If deficits represented "new dollars" in the
economy, the record $1.2 trillion in For
Year 2009 deficit spending that began in October
2008--well before the stimulus added $200
billion more--would have already overheated
the economy. Yet despite the historic 7 percent
increase in GDP deficit spending over the
previous year, the economy shrank by 2.3 percent
in year 2009. To argue that deficits represent
new money injected into the economy is to argue
that the economy would have contracted by 9.3
percent without this "infusion" of added deficit
spending (or even more, given the Keynesian
multiplier effect that was supposed to further
boost the impact). That is simply not plausible,
and few if any economists have claimed otherwise.

And if the original $1.2 trillion in deficit
spending failed to slow the economy's slide,
there was no reason to believe that adding $200
billion more in 2009 deficit spending from the
stimulus bill would suddenly do the trick.
Proponents of yet another stimulus should answer
the following questions:

(1) If nearly $1.4 trillion budget deficits are
not enough stimulus, how much is enough?

(2) If Keynesian stimulus
repeatedly fails, why still rely on the theory?

This is no longer a theoretical exercise. The
idea that increased deficit spending can cure
recessions has been tested repeatedly, and it has
failed repeatedly. The economic models that
assert that every $1 of deficit spending grows
the economy by $1.50 cannot explain why $1.4
trillion in deficit spending did not create a
$2.1 trillion explosion of new economic activity.

Go here to sign the Obama Impeachment petition

Obama Says, How Did This Happen?

This was not the change I was hoping for. Let's see----Can I offer you healthcare to get re-elected?